[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1452438805-3205-1-git-send-email-AmeenAli023@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 17:13:25 +0200
From: Ameen <ameenali023@...il.com>
To: mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, mhocko@...e.com,
vbabka@...e.cz
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ameen <AmeenAli023@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Use num_possible_cpus() instead of direct use of NR_CPUS.
WARNING: usage of NR_CPUS is often wrong - consider using cpu_possible(), num_possible_cpus()..
Signed-off-by : Ameen Ali <Ameenali023@...il.com>
---
kernel/smp.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
index d903c02..94033ac 100644
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -549,13 +549,13 @@ static int __init maxcpus(char *str)
early_param("maxcpus", maxcpus);
/* Setup number of possible processor ids */
-int nr_cpu_ids __read_mostly = NR_CPUS;
+int nr_cpu_ids __read_mostly = num_possible_cpus();
EXPORT_SYMBOL(nr_cpu_ids);
/* An arch may set nr_cpu_ids earlier if needed, so this would be redundant */
void __init setup_nr_cpu_ids(void)
{
- nr_cpu_ids = find_last_bit(cpumask_bits(cpu_possible_mask),NR_CPUS) + 1;
+ nr_cpu_ids = find_last_bit(cpumask_bits(cpu_possible_mask),num_possible_cpus()) + 1;
}
void __weak smp_announce(void)
--
2.5.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists