[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160110190158.GK24441@pengutronix.de>
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 20:01:58 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
Cc: Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: imx28: add pinmux for USB1 overcurrent on pwm2
Hello,
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 02:38:00PM +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> > Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com> hat am 10. Januar 2016 um 14:13 geschrieben:
> > Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com> writes:
> >
> > > Hi Mans,
> > >
> > >> Mans Rullgard <mans@...sr.com> hat am 10. Januar 2016 um 13:40 geschrieben:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Add pinmux setting for USB1 overcurrent on pwm2 pad.
> > >
> > > could you please change your patch to describe why you need to add
> > > this pinmux?
> >
> > I'm working on a board that is wired that way. I can of course put this
> > in the board-specific dts if that's preferable.
>
> So the board isn't submitted to mainline?
>
> IMHO the change is okay, but the description doesn't explain why is it needed.
>
> So a suitable description would be that it's needed for board xy.
The problem with pinmuxing on i.MX23/28 is that the order of pinmux
groups is to a certain degree important. So not everything is possible
in the machine specific dts. (I didn't have an eye on this issue, maybe
it's fixed in the meantime?)
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists