[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160110212531-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 21:29:06 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-metag@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
x86@...nel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
adi-buildroot-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] checkpatch.pl: add missing memory barriers
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 07:17:31AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-01-10 at 07:07 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Sun, 2016-01-10 at 13:56 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > SMP-only barriers were missing in checkpatch.pl
> > >
> > > Refactor code slightly to make adding more variants easier.
> > []
> > > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> []
> > If I use a variable called $smp_barriers, I'd expect
> > it to actually be the smp_barriers, not to have to
> > prefix it with smp_ before using it.
> >
> > my $smp_barriers = qr{
> > smp_store_release|
> > smp_load_acquire|
> > smp_store_mb|
> > smp_read_barrier_depends
>
> That's missing (?:barriers) too.
My version has it but need to add ?: to avoid
a capture group.
> btw: shouldn't this also have
> smp_mb__(?:before|after)_atomic
> ?
Good catch, included in the next version.
--
MST
Powered by blists - more mailing lists