linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: strange commit in the parisc-hd tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 12 Jan 2016 09:32:57 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Cc:	Parisc List <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: strange commit in the parisc-hd tree

Hi Helge,

On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 22:46:48 +0100 Helge Deller <deller@....de> wrote:
>
> On 10.01.2016 23:28, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > I noticed the following commit in the parisc-hd tree today:
> > 
> >   43122681dd75 ("Fix __ARCH_SI_PREAMBLE_SIZE on parisc")
> > 
> > which among other things says:
> > 
> >   This patch is not planned to be committed as it currently is.  
> 
> Right, I split it up into two.

Good idea.

> > [...] Please remove it from linux-next inclusion until it is ready.  
> 
> Sure, I just removed it now.

Thanks.

> > Delibeately introducing a patch to linux-next that may well cause build breakage
> > in other architectures just before the merge window opens is a bit antisocial.  
> 
> That was in no way my intention.
> In contrary, I wanted to see if other platforms are affected by the same bug without knowing.
> Do you by any chance know if it broke some of the existing platforms?
> If yes, that would be valuable info...

No, because I took it out of linux-next yesterday.  It is more a timing
thing, if you had done that a few weeks ago, I would have just reported
any build errors and continued on, but just before the merge window
opens we don;t need the distraction.  Also, if you can create another
branch and give it to the zero day build farm, you should get better
feed back.

Also, linux-next is not supposed to contain patches without a
Signed-off-by ...
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au