[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160111225104.GO17997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 22:51:05 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: chengang@...ndsoft.com.cn
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
nicolas.iooss_linux@....org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: dcache: Use bool return value instead of int
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 05:30:45AM +0800, chengang@...ndsoft.com.cn wrote:
> From: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com>
>
> Use bool type for all functions which return boolean value. It will not
> only let code clearer, but also sometimes let gcc produce better code.
What's the point of this chunk?
> static enum d_walk_ret check_mount(void *data, struct dentry *dentry)
> {
> - int *ret = data;
> + bool *ret = data;
> if (d_mountpoint(dentry)) {
> - *ret = 1;
> + *ret = true;
> return D_WALK_QUIT;
> }
> return D_WALK_CONTINUE;
You are replacing a 1-word store with 1-byte store; if anything, that's more
likely to yield _worse_ code, not better one.
> -static inline int d_unhashed(const struct dentry *dentry)
> +static inline bool d_unhashed(const struct dentry *dentry)
> {
> return hlist_bl_unhashed(&dentry->d_hash);
> }
>
> -static inline int d_unlinked(const struct dentry *dentry)
> +static inline bool d_unlinked(const struct dentry *dentry)
> {
> return d_unhashed(dentry) && !IS_ROOT(dentry);
> }
> -static inline int simple_positive(struct dentry *dentry)
> +static inline bool simple_positive(struct dentry *dentry)
> {
> return d_really_is_positive(dentry) && !d_unhashed(dentry);
> }
And these three are harmless, but completely pointless...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists