lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 11 Jan 2016 15:50:00 +0800
From:	xuejiancheng <xuejiancheng@...wei.com>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC:	<mturquette@...libre.com>, <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	<p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	<pawel.moll@....com>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
	<ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>, <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	<linux@....linux.org.uk>, <khilman@...aro.org>, <arnd@...db.de>,
	<olof@...om.net>, <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>,
	<haojian.zhuang@...aro.org>, <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>,
	<bintian.wang@...wei.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <yanhaifeng@...ilicon.com>,
	<yanghongwei@...ilicon.com>, <suwenping@...ilicon.com>,
	<ml.yang@...ilicon.com>, <gaofei@...ilicon.com>,
	<zhangzhenxing@...ilicon.com>, <xuejiancheng@...ilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/6] mfd: dt-bindings: add device tree bindings for
 Hi3519 sysctrl

Hi Lee Jones,

    Thanks for your comments.

On 2016/1/11 13:48, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Jan 2016, Jiancheng Xue wrote:
> 
>> Add device tree bindings for Hi3519 system controller.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiancheng Xue <xuejiancheng@...wei.com>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hi3519.txt | 14 ++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hi3519.txt
> 
> I have this patch, but none of the others in the set, thus I am
> lacking context.
> 
I can forward other patches in the set to you. Thank you.

>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hi3519.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hi3519.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..115c5be
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hi3519.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
>> +* Hisilicon Hi3519 System Controller Block
>> +
>> +This bindings use the following binding:
>> +Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/syscon.txt
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> +- compatible: "hisilicon,hi3519-sysctrl".
>> +- reg: the register region of this block
>> +
>> +Examples:
>> +sysctrl: system-controller@...10000 {
>> +	compatible = "hisilicon,hi3519-sysctrl", "syscon";
>> +	reg = <0x12010000 0x1000>;
>> +};
> 
> There is no requirement (nor want) for binding documents where the
> given device is simply using highly generic bindings.  This just
> amounts to churn.
> 
This block is specific for Hi3519 SOC, and may has its own driver.
So I think it's better to keep this binding.

Jiancheng








Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ