linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] mfd: smsc-ece1099: Fine-tuning for smsc_i2c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160111080850.GR3331@x1>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jan 2016 08:08:50 +0000
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] mfd: smsc-ece1099: Fine-tuning for smsc_i2c_probe()

This set is confusing.

Why do you have a cover letter specifying this as a 2 patch set, yet
there are 4 patches attached to it?

> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 15:10:48 +0100

What format is this?

> A few update suggestions were taken into account
> from static source code analysis.
> 
> Markus Elfring (2):
>   Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation
>   Refactoring
> 
>  drivers/mfd/smsc-ece1099.c | 11 ++++-------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog