linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mfd: twl-core: One function call less in add_numbered

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160111082922.GB14104@x1>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jan 2016 08:29:22 +0000
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc:	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: twl-core: One function call less in
 add_numbered_child() after error detection

On Tue, 29 Dec 2015, SF Markus Elfring wrote:

> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 19:29:08 +0100
> 
> The platform_device_put() function was called in one case by the
> add_numbered_child() function during error handling even if the passed
> variable "pdev" contained a null pointer.
> 
> Implementation details could be improved by the adjustment of jump targets
> according to the Linux coding style convention.
> 
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/twl-core.c | 21 ++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c b/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c
> index 831696e..0d9350c 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c
> @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ add_numbered_child(unsigned mod_no, const char *name, int num,
>  	if (!pdev) {
>  		dev_dbg(&twl->client->dev, "can't alloc dev\n");

Change this to be dev_err()

>  		status = -ENOMEM;
> -		goto err;
> +		goto report_failure;

... and just return status from here.

>  	}
>  
>  	pdev->dev.parent = &twl->client->dev;
> @@ -634,7 +634,7 @@ add_numbered_child(unsigned mod_no, const char *name, int num,
>  		status = platform_device_add_data(pdev, pdata, pdata_len);
>  		if (status < 0) {
>  			dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "can't add platform_data\n");
> -			goto err;
> +			goto put_device;
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> @@ -647,21 +647,20 @@ add_numbered_child(unsigned mod_no, const char *name, int num,
>  		status = platform_device_add_resources(pdev, r, irq1 ? 2 : 1);
>  		if (status < 0) {
>  			dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "can't add irqs\n");
> -			goto err;
> +			goto put_device;
>  		}
>  	}
>  
>  	status = platform_device_add(pdev);
> -	if (status == 0)
> +	if (!status) {

You've changed the way you handle errors from this point.  To be more
consistent it would be better if you checked for status, then jump to
put_device in the case of a failure, as you do above.

>  		device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, can_wakeup);
> -
> -err:
> -	if (status < 0) {
> -		platform_device_put(pdev);
> -		dev_err(&twl->client->dev, "can't add %s dev\n", name);
> -		return ERR_PTR(status);
> +		return &pdev->dev;
>  	}
> -	return &pdev->dev;
> +put_device:
> +	platform_device_put(pdev);
> +report_failure:
> +	dev_err(&twl->client->dev, "can't add %s dev\n", name);
> +	return ERR_PTR(status);
>  }
>  
>  static inline struct device *add_child(unsigned mod_no, const char *name,

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog