lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <F297158F9216834BAB1B3BCC98DBDCCB42D2E3@mailsh.asrmicro.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jan 2016 17:04:38 +0800
From:	Zhou Qiao(周侨) <qiaozhou@...micro.com>
To:	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	<jason@...edaemon.net>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [Questions]: how to extend nr_irqs for arch arm64

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Gleixner [mailto:tglx@...utronix.de]
> Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 4:51 PM
> To: Zhou Qiao(周侨)
> Cc: jason@...edaemon.net; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: RE: [Questions]: how to extend nr_irqs for arch arm64
> 
> On Mon, 11 Jan 2016, Zhou Qiao(周侨) wrote:
> > I met an issue here. The nr_irqs is extended when the start_irq + cnt
> > > nr_irqs. So when nr_irqs is not extended(still 64), a device with a
> > large
> > hr_irq(70) will get a wrong virq. since it will be mod by nr_irqs
> > before
> 
> No, it won't get a wrong virq. It will get a virq and it does not
> matter at all whether the hardware irq number is 10, 70, 500 or 5000.
> What's your problem?
Let's assume the hw_irq is 70, and after the mod operation, it will call irq_alloc_descs_from with parameter from = 6, instead of 70. So the newly allocated descriptor is mapped to hw_irq = 6, not 70. Later when driver registers irq with irq = 70, it will fail since there is no irq descriptor for irq = 70.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	tglx
> 
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ