linux-kernel - Re: Correct place for USB PHY driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <569383BB.3030400@ti.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jan 2016 15:58:11 +0530
From:	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
To:	Mason <slash.tmp@...e.fr>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
CC:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-usb <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: Correct place for USB PHY driver

hI,

On Monday 11 January 2016 03:37 PM, Mason wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I have a board with a Chipidea controller.
> I use a custom PHY driver for it.
> 
> Should the PHY driver live in drivers/phy or in drivers/usb/phy ?

All new phy drivers should be in drivers/phy using the generic PHY framework.
> 
> I was playing with a modular build and hit this problem:
> ERROR: "of_usb_get_phy_mode" [drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc.ko] undefined!
> 
> I'm currently using v4.1.13 and I saw that Arnd fixed something related
> probably in a later version:
> 
>   http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/457561
> 
> Was this patch accepted upstream?

I think no.

Thanks
Kishon