[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160111123423-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 12:35:47 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
"Mailing List, Arm" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-metag@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
x86@...nel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
adi-buildroot-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] checkpatch: add virt barriers
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 02:52:16PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 09:13 +1100, Julian Calaby wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 6:31 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
> > > Add virt_ barriers to list of barriers to check for
> > > presence of a comment.
> []
> > > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> []
> > > @@ -5133,7 +5133,8 @@ sub process {
> > > }x;
> > > my $all_barriers = qr{
> > > $barriers|
> > > - smp_(?:$smp_barrier_stems)
> > > + smp_(?:$smp_barrier_stems)|
> > > + virt_(?:$smp_barrier_stems)
> >
> > Sorry I'm late to the party here, but would it make sense to write this as:
> >
> > (?:smp|virt)_(?:$smp_barrier_stems)
>
> Yes. Perhaps the name might be better as barrier_stems.
>
> Also, ideally this would be longest match first or use \b
> after the matches so that $all_barriers could work
> successfully without a following \s*\(
>
> my $all_barriers = qr{
> (?:smp|virt)_(?:barrier_stems)|
> $barriers)
> }x;
>
> or maybe add separate $smp_barriers and $virt_barriers
>
> <shrug> it doesn't matter much in any case
OK just to clarify - are you OK with merging the patch as is?
Refactorings can come as patches on top if required.
--
MST
Powered by blists - more mailing lists