linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 09/13] x86/mm: Disable interrupts when flushing the TLB using CR3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160111105105.GB29448@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jan 2016 11:51:05 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 09/13] x86/mm: Disable interrupts when flushing the TLB
 using CR3


* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> >> Or is there some reason you wanted the odd flags version? If so, that
> >> should be documented.
> >
> > What do you mean "odd"?
> 
> It's odd because it makes no sense for non-pcid (christ, I wish Intel had just 
> called it "asid" instead, "pcid" always makes me react to "pci"), and I think it 
> would make more sense to pair up the pcid case with the invpcid rather than have 
> those preemption rules here.

The naming is really painful, so a trivial suggestion: could we just name all the 
Linux side bits 'asid' or 'ctx_id' (even in x86 arch code) and only use 'PCID' 
nomenclature in the very lowest level code?

I.e. rename pcid_live_cpus et al and most functions to the asid or ctx_id or asid 
naming scheme or so. That would hide most of the naming ugliness.

Thanks,

	Ingo