lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5693980A.5020400@intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jan 2016 13:54:50 +0200
From:	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf record: missing buildid for callstack modules

On 11/01/16 13:02, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
> 
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:27:56AM +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> On 09/01/16 12:31, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>>> Hi Stephane,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 10:01:24AM -0800, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
>>>> <acme@...nel.org> wrote:
>>>>> Em Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 07:47:03AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
>>>>>> On January 8, 2016 7:00:35 AM GMT+09:00, Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
>>>>>>> <acme@...nel.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Em Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 01:56:14PM -0800, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Whenever you do:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     $ perf record -g -a sleep 10
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Perf will collect the callstack for each sample. At the end of the
>>>>>>>>> run, perf record
>>>>>>>>> adds the buildid for all dso with at least one sample. But when it
>>>>>>> does this, it
>>>>>>>>> only looks at the sampled IP and ignore the modules traversed by the
>>>>>>> callstack.
>>>>>>>>> That means that, it is not possible to uniquely identify the modules
>>>>>>> executed,
>>>>>>>>> unless they had at least one IP sample captured. But this is not
>>>>>>>>> always the case.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How about providing an option to perf record to force collecting
>>>>>>>>> buildid for all IPs
>>>>>>>>> captured in the callstack? I understand that would cost more at the
>>>>>>> end of the
>>>>>>>>> collection, but this would be beneficial to several monitoring
>>>>>>> scenarios.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I agree, would consider applying a patch that provides the option but
>>>>>>>> does not do this by default.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I agree, not the default.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Stephane,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please see
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/22/249
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Oops, Stephane, please try this, so that we can finally merge it :-\
>>>>>
>>>> I will try it today. However, I am a bit worried about the performance
>>>> impact. Unless I am missing something in this approach we may end up
>>>> looking up N times the same module if it appears in N callstacks. In
>>>> Andi's suggested approach, there would be only one pass at the beginning
>>>> (or the end of the run). But you could miss some modules if they are gone
>>>> by the time you run the pass.
>>>
>>> How about this then?
>>>
>>> Adrian, is it ok to skip process_buildids() for the auxtrace?
>>
>> If you don't post-process (i.e. call process_buildids), then where do the
>> DSOs come from? i.e. dsos__hit_all() just hits the DSOs that exist.
> 
> Ah, right.  I somehow thought that it was processed already elsewhere.
> 
> Then, how about this?

Looks OK for auxtrace.

In other respects you should probably clarify what happens when --no-buildid
and --buildid-all are used together.  Maybe it should be an error.

> 
> 
> 
>>>From 38b2bc273329afe4334a11d87d20ef71639132fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 22:37:55 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] perf record: Add --buildid-all option
> 
> The --buildid-all option is to record build-id of all DSOs in the file.
> It might be very costly to postprocess samples to find which DSO hits.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> ---
>  tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt |  3 +++
>  tools/perf/builtin-record.c              | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
>  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt
> index 3a1a32f5479f..fbceb631387c 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt
> +++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt
> @@ -338,6 +338,9 @@ Options passed to clang when compiling BPF scriptlets.
>  Specify vmlinux path which has debuginfo.
>  (enabled when BPF prologue is on)
>  
> +--buildid-all::
> +Record build-id of all DSOs regardless whether it's actually hit or not.
> +
>  SEE ALSO
>  --------
>  linkperf:perf-stat[1], linkperf:perf-list[1]
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> index dc4e0adf5c5b..319712a4e02b 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ struct record {
>  	int			realtime_prio;
>  	bool			no_buildid;
>  	bool			no_buildid_cache;
> +	bool			buildid_all;
>  	unsigned long long	samples;
>  };
>  
> @@ -362,6 +363,13 @@ static int process_buildids(struct record *rec)
>  	 */
>  	symbol_conf.ignore_vmlinux_buildid = true;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * If --buildid-all is given, it marks all DSO regardless of hits,
> +	 * so no need to process samples.
> +	 */
> +	if (rec->buildid_all)
> +		rec->tool.sample = NULL;
> +
>  	return perf_session__process_events(session);
>  }
>  
> @@ -756,12 +764,8 @@ out_child:
>  
>  		if (!rec->no_buildid) {
>  			process_buildids(rec);
> -			/*
> -			 * We take all buildids when the file contains
> -			 * AUX area tracing data because we do not decode the
> -			 * trace because it would take too long.
> -			 */
> -			if (rec->opts.full_auxtrace)
> +
> +			if (rec->buildid_all)
>  				dsos__hit_all(rec->session);
>  		}
>  		perf_session__write_header(rec->session, rec->evlist, fd, true);
> @@ -1138,6 +1142,8 @@ struct option __record_options[] = {
>  		   "options passed to clang when compiling BPF scriptlets"),
>  	OPT_STRING(0, "vmlinux", &symbol_conf.vmlinux_name,
>  		   "file", "vmlinux pathname"),
> +	OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "buildid-all", &record.buildid_all,
> +		    "Record build-id of all DSOs regardless of hits"),
>  	OPT_END()
>  };
>  
> @@ -1255,6 +1261,14 @@ int cmd_record(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __maybe_unused)
>  	if (err)
>  		goto out_symbol_exit;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * We take all buildids when the file contains
> +	 * AUX area tracing data because we do not decode the
> +	 * trace because it would take too long.
> +	 */
> +	if (rec->opts.full_auxtrace)
> +		rec->buildid_all = true;
> +
>  	if (record_opts__config(&rec->opts)) {
>  		err = -EINVAL;
>  		goto out_symbol_exit;
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ