linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/3] drm: arm-hdlcd: add explictit DRM dependency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <10589993.Lxk3kTHnpj@wuerfel>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jan 2016 13:18:55 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/3] drm: arm-hdlcd: add explictit DRM dependency

On Monday 11 January 2016 11:12:56 Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 09:39:46AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Monday 04 January 2016 09:24:16 Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > 
> > > Ugh... wouldn't it be much simpler to get rid of DRM_ARM? It seems like
> > > a completely superfluous option to me. I don't think we've ever had the
> > > equivalent of "vendor" Kconfig options in DRM, and I don't see why we'd
> > > need to start now. If ARM was going to add another driver it can simply
> > > have a separate Kconfig entry. There should be no need to select the
> > > vendor option first.
> > 
> > Fine with me too. I vaguely remembered having seen some discussion about
> > this, so I decided to do a minimal fix, but I agree that would be more
> > in line with the other drivers.
> > 
> >       Arnd
> > 
> 
> Arnd,
> 
> I'm OK with the whole series of Kconfig clean-up/fixes and I offer my appologies
> for adding noise with my patchset. Please let me know how do you prefer to handle
> them. I'm OK with merging your changes into my series before sending the pull
> request to David Airlie.

Please merge them into your tree if you have some other changes to send to him.

I just realized that these are in your own git tree at the moment, not
in drm-next. I guess that means you will rebase the whole series after -rc1 and
submit it into linux-4.6, right?

If so, just fold my fixes into your patches when you rebase.

	Arnd