[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3956038.NYKA2GIJmd@wuerfel>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 14:55:27 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Mason <slash.tmp@...e.fr>
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-usb <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Correct place for USB PHY driver
On Monday 11 January 2016 12:56:27 Mason wrote:
> On 11/01/2016 11:28, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>
> > On Monday 11 January 2016 03:37 PM, Mason wrote:
> >
> >> I have a board with a Chipidea controller.
> >> I use a custom PHY driver for it.
> >>
> >> Should the PHY driver live in drivers/phy or in drivers/usb/phy ?
> >
> > All new phy drivers should be in drivers/phy using the generic PHY framework.
> >
> >> I was playing with a modular build and hit this problem:
> >> ERROR: "of_usb_get_phy_mode" [drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc.ko] undefined!
> >>
> >> I'm currently using v4.1.13 and I saw that Arnd fixed something related
> >> probably in a later version:
> >>
> >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/457561
> >>
> >> Was this patch accepted upstream?
> >
> > I think no.
>
> The driver I use is in drivers/phy and my config has
>
> CONFIG_GENERIC_PHY=y
> # CONFIG_USB_PHY is not set
>
> But I do hit the "of_usb_get_phy_mode undefined" error when I
> set all of USB to m.
>
> Arnd, do you think your patch needs to be carried over to generic PHY?
I think my patch is still needed, I will resubmit it if it doesn't make
it into 4.5-rc1.
In the meantime you can work around the problem by setting CONFIG_USB=y
instead of CONFIG_USB=m.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists