[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yw1x37u4xkyf.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 14:14:00 +0000
From: Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dmaengine: dw: fix cyclic transfer callbacks
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> writes:
> On 11-01-16, 13:04, Mans Rullgard wrote:
>> Cyclic transfer callbacks rely on block completion interrupts which were
>> disabled in commit ff7b05f29fd4 ("dmaengine/dw_dmac: Don't handle block
>> interrupts"). This re-enables block interrupts so the cyclic callbacks
>> can work. Other transfer types are not affected as they set the INT_EN
>> bit only on the last block.
>>
>> Fixes: ff7b05f29fd4 ("dmaengine/dw_dmac: Don't handle block interrupts")
>> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@...sr.com>
>> ---
>> Changes:
>> - new patch
>> ---
>> drivers/dma/dw/core.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
>
> BTW, Shouldn't you mark these for stable trees as well ? :)
Probably. Some maintainers prefer to do that themselves, but apparently
you're not one of them.
--
Måns Rullgård
Powered by blists - more mailing lists