linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] memory-hotplug: add automatic onlining policy for the newly added memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87twmki2ew.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:03:35 +0100
From:	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To:	Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@...cle.com>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
	Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
	Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>,
	Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] memory-hotplug: add automatic onlining policy for the newly added memory

Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@...cle.com> writes:

[skip]

>> > > And we want to have it working out of the box.
>> > > So, I think that we should find proper solution. I suppose that we can schedule
>> > > a task here which auto online attached blocks. Hmmm... Not nice but should work.
>> > > Or maybe you have better idea how to fix this issue.
>> >
>> > I'd like to avoid additional delays and memory allocations between
>> > adding new memory and onlining it (and this is the main purpose of the
>> > patch). Maybe we can have a tristate online parameter ('online_now',
>> > 'online_delay', 'keep_offlined') and handle it
>> > accordingly. Alternatively I can suggest we have the onlining in Xen
>> > balloon driver code, memhp_auto_online is exported so we can call
>> > online_pages() after we release the ballon_mutex.
>>
>> This is not nice too. I prefer the same code path for every case.
>> Give me some time. I will think how to solve that issue.
>
> It looks that we can safely call mutex_unlock() just before add_memory_resource()
> call and retake lock immediately after add_memory_resource(). add_memory_resource()
> itself does not play with balloon stuff and even if online_pages() does then it
> take balloon_mutex in right place. Additionally, only one balloon task can run,
> so, I think that we are on safe side. Am I right?

I think you are as balloon_mutex is internal to xen driver and there is
only one balloon_process() running at the time. I just smoke-tested the
following:

commit 0fce4746a0090d533e9302cc42b3d3c0645d756d
Author: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Date:   Mon Jan 11 14:22:11 2016 +0100

    xen_balloon: make hotplug auto online work
    
    Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>

diff --git a/drivers/xen/balloon.c b/drivers/xen/balloon.c
index 890c3b5..08bbf35 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/balloon.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/balloon.c
@@ -338,7 +338,10 @@ static enum bp_state reserve_additional_memory(void)
 	}
 #endif
 
-	rc = add_memory_resource(nid, resource, false);
+	mutex_unlock(&balloon_mutex);
+	rc = add_memory_resource(nid, resource, memhp_auto_online);
+	mutex_lock(&balloon_mutex);
+
 	if (rc) {
 		pr_warn("Cannot add additional memory (%i)\n", rc);
 		goto err;
@@ -565,8 +568,10 @@ static void balloon_process(struct work_struct *work)
 		if (credit > 0) {
 			if (balloon_is_inflated())
 				state = increase_reservation(credit);
-			else
+			else {
+				printk("balloon_process: adding memory (credit: %ld)!\n", credit);
 				state = reserve_additional_memory();
+			}
 		}
 
 		if (credit < 0)

And it seems to work (unrelated rant: 'xl mem-set' after 'xl max-mem'
doesn't work with "libxl: error: libxl.c:4809:libxl_set_memory_target:
memory_dynamic_max must be less than or equal to memory_static_max". At
the same time I'm able to increase the reservation with "echo
NEW_VALUE > /sys/devices/system/xen_memory/xen_memory0/target_kb" from
inside the guest. Was it supposed to be like that?).

While the patch misses the logic for empty pages (see David's comment in
a parallel thread) it should work for the general case the same way
auto-online works for Hyper-V and ACPI memory hotplugs.

-- 
  Vitaly