linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] spi: atmel: improve internal vs gpio chip-select choice

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160111161333.GK6588@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:13:33 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Mans Rullgard <mans@...sr.com>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>,
	"Yang, Wenyou" <Wenyou.Yang@...el.com>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spi: atmel: improve internal vs gpio chip-select
 choice

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 04:01:42PM +0000, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> The driver currently chooses between internal chip-select or gpio
> based on the existence of the cs-gpios DT property which fails on
> non-DT systems and also enforces the same choice for all devices.

Normally you shouldn't send incremental patches against patches that
have already been applied.  However in this case I'm going to drop your
original patch anyway due to the issue that was found so it's OK.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)