Message-ID: <CAFpQJXVVPMvj4AC9G7Gd71O_xFAKfxNkzWh1us4ENP77Do=ceA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jan 2016 22:56:59 +0530
From:	Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gpkulkarni@...il.com>
To:	Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@...e.com>
Cc:	Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
	Prasun Kapoor <Prasun.Kapoor@...iumnetworks.com>,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Robert Richter <rrichter@...ium.com>,
	Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@...iumnetworks.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64, pci, numa: Adding helper functions as required by pci

Hi Bjorn, Will,

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@...e.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 09/01/16 16:35, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
>>
>> Hi Bjorn,
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 11:35:17AM +0530, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 11:36 PM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 12:01:31PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 04:08:50PM +0530, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Adding helper functions and necessary code to make
>>>>>>> pci driver(pci-host-generic) numa aware.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This patch is on top of arm64-numa v7.
>>>>>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg460813.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@...iumnetworks.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h       | 8 +++++---
>>>>>>>   arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c             | 8 ++++++++
>>>>>>>   drivers/pci/host/pci-host-generic.c | 1 +
>
>
> set_dev_node() in pci-host-generic.c is missing in v8 of your numa patches.
> Was this forgotten?
i am not sure on adding numa required change(it is one line add) to
pci-host-generic.c in numa patchset itself.
Is it more appropriate to send as separate patch?
please suggest.


Thanks Matthias for your comment.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
>>>>>>>   3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h
>>>>>>> b/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h
>>>>>>> index b8c2a3f..1eca4db 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h
>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h
>>>>>>> @@ -15,9 +15,11 @@
>>>>>>>   extern int __node_distance(int from, int to);
>>>>>>>   #define node_distance(a, b) __node_distance(a, b)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -/* dummy definitions for pci functions */
>>>>>>> -#define pcibus_to_node(node)       0
>>>>>>> -#define cpumask_of_pcibus(bus)     0
>>>>>>> +struct pci_bus;
>>>>>>> +extern int pcibus_to_node(struct pci_bus *bus);
>>>>>>> +#define cpumask_of_pcibus(bus)     (pcibus_to_node(bus) == -1 ?
>>>>>>> \
>>>>>>> +                            cpu_all_mask :                         \
>>>>>>> +                            cpumask_of_node(pcibus_to_node(bus)))
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All the arch definitions of cpumask_of_pcibus() are pretty similar;
>>>>>> could they be made more generic?  At the very least, can you drop the
>>>>>> definition here and use the one in include/asm-generic/topology.h,
>>>>>> which is identical to what you're defining here?
>>>>
>>>> macro cpumask_of_pcibus is defined under #ifndef CONFIG_NUMA in
>>>> include/asm-generic/topology.h
>>>> and this macro is defined again for NUMA in respective arch header
>>>> files.
>>>> i think moving this macro from ifndef will allow us to use without
>>>> redefinition.
>>>>
>>>> --- a/include/asm-generic/topology.h
>>>> +++ b/include/asm-generic/topology.h
>>>> @@ -54,14 +54,14 @@
>>>>   #define pcibus_to_node(bus)    ((void)(bus), -1)
>>>>   #endif
>>>>
>>>> +#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
>>>> +
>>>>   #ifndef cpumask_of_pcibus
>>>>   #define cpumask_of_pcibus(bus) (pcibus_to_node(bus) == -1 ?
>>>> \
>>>>                                   cpu_all_mask :
>>>> \
>>>>                                   cpumask_of_node(pcibus_to_node(bus)))
>>>>   #endif
>>>>
>>>> -#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
>>>> -
>>>>   #if !defined(CONFIG_NUMA) || !defined(CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES)
>>>>
>>>>   #ifndef set_numa_mem
>>>>
>>>> i have got below compilation error withour macro defined in arch code.
>>>>
>>>> drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c: In function ‘cpuaffinity_show’:
>>>> drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c:114:15: error: implicit declaration of
>>>> function ‘cpumask_of_pcibus’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>>> drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c:114:34: warning: initialization makes pointer
>>>> from integer without a cast [enabled by default]
>>>> drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c: In function ‘cpulistaffinity_show’:
>>>> drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c:123:34: warning: initialization makes pointer
>>>> from integer without a cast [enabled by default]
>>>> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> i can send this as separate patch( as a  fix patch).
>>>
>>>
>>> Unless your series has already been merged, I don't like the idea of a
>>> separate fix patch.  The whole point of reviews is to try to fix as
>>> many things as we can *before* merging.
>>
>> thanks for the review.
>> sure, i will add  this as part of my numa patch series.
>>>
>>>
>>> Bjorn
>>
>>
>> thanks
>> Ganapat
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>>
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists