[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1452533760-13787-11-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 17:35:51 +0000
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, mturquette@...libre.com,
steve.muckle@...aro.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
morten.rasmussen@....com, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
juri.lelli@....com
Subject: [RFC PATCH 10/19] cpufreq: assert policy->rwsem is held in cpufreq_set_policy
Since cpufreq_set_policy is modifying policy, it has to work under policy->
rwsem protection.
Assert such condition.
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index d91fdb8..f1f9fbc 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -2109,6 +2109,8 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
pr_debug("setting new policy for CPU %u: %u - %u kHz\n",
new_policy->cpu, new_policy->min, new_policy->max);
+ lockdep_assert_held(&policy->rwsem);
+
memcpy(&new_policy->cpuinfo, &policy->cpuinfo, sizeof(policy->cpuinfo));
/*
--
2.2.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists