[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1452533760-13787-18-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 17:35:58 +0000
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, mturquette@...libre.com,
steve.muckle@...aro.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
morten.rasmussen@....com, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
juri.lelli@....com
Subject: [RFC PATCH 17/19] cpufreq: stop checking for cpufreq_driver being present in cpufreq_cpu_get
After cpufreq_driver_lock() is acquired in cpufreq_cpu_get() we are sure
we can't race with cpufreq_policy_free() (which is in the path that ends
up removing cpufreq_driver). We can thus safely remove check for
cpufreq_driver being present (which is a leftover from commit
6eed9404ab3c ("cpufreq: Use rwsem for protecting critical sections")).
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 797bfae..6c9bef7 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -282,15 +282,15 @@ struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get(unsigned int cpu)
if (WARN_ON(cpu >= nr_cpu_ids))
return NULL;
- /* get the cpufreq driver */
read_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
- if (cpufreq_driver) {
- /* get the CPU */
- policy = cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(cpu);
- if (policy)
- kobject_get(&policy->kobj);
- }
+ /*
+ * If we get a policy, cpufreq_policy_free() didn't
+ * yet run.
+ */
+ policy = cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(cpu);
+ if (policy)
+ kobject_get(&policy->kobj);
read_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
--
2.2.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists