[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1452533760-13787-6-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 17:35:46 +0000
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, mturquette@...libre.com,
steve.muckle@...aro.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
morten.rasmussen@....com, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
juri.lelli@....com
Subject: [RFC PATCH 05/19] cpufreq: assert locking when accessing cpufreq_policy_list
cpufreq_policy_list is guarded by cpufreq_driver_lock. Add appropriate
locking assertions to check that we always access the list while holding
the associated lock.
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 00a00cd..63d6efb 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ static bool suitable_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, bool active)
static struct cpufreq_policy *next_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
bool active)
{
+ lockdep_assert_held(&cpufreq_driver_lock);
do {
policy = list_next_entry(policy, policy_list);
@@ -80,6 +81,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_policy *first_policy(bool active)
{
struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
+ lockdep_assert_held(&cpufreq_driver_lock);
/* No policies in the list */
if (list_empty(&cpufreq_policy_list))
return NULL;
@@ -2430,6 +2432,7 @@ int cpufreq_register_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data)
if (ret)
goto err_boost_unreg;
+ lockdep_assert_held(&cpufreq_driver_lock);
if (!(cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_STICKY) &&
list_empty(&cpufreq_policy_list)) {
/* if all ->init() calls failed, unregister */
--
2.2.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists