linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH 04/19] cpufreq: bring data structures close to their locks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1452533760-13787-5-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jan 2016 17:35:45 +0000
From:	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
	viresh.kumar@...aro.org, mturquette@...libre.com,
	steve.muckle@...aro.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
	morten.rasmussen@....com, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
	juri.lelli@....com
Subject: [RFC PATCH 04/19] cpufreq: bring data structures close to their locks

Currently it is not easy to figure out which lock/mutex protects which data
structure. Clean things up by moving data structures and their locks/mutexs
closer; also, change comments to document relations further.

Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 2e41356..00a00cd 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -31,7 +31,25 @@
 #include <linux/tick.h>
 #include <trace/events/power.h>
 
+/**
+ * Iterate over governors
+ *
+ * cpufreq_governor_list is protected by cpufreq_governor_mutex.
+ */
+static LIST_HEAD(cpufreq_governor_list);
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(cpufreq_governor_mutex);
+#define for_each_governor(__governor)				\
+	list_for_each_entry(__governor, &cpufreq_governor_list, governor_list)
+
+/**
+ * The "cpufreq driver" - the arch- or hardware-dependent low
+ * level driver of CPUFreq support, and its spinlock (cpufreq_driver_lock).
+ * This lock also protects cpufreq_cpu_data array and cpufreq_policy_list.
+ */
+static struct cpufreq_driver *cpufreq_driver;
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpufreq_policy *, cpufreq_cpu_data);
 static LIST_HEAD(cpufreq_policy_list);
+static DEFINE_RWLOCK(cpufreq_driver_lock);
 
 static inline bool policy_is_inactive(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 {
@@ -86,21 +104,6 @@ static struct cpufreq_policy *first_policy(bool active)
 #define for_each_inactive_policy(__policy)		\
 	for_each_suitable_policy(__policy, false)
 
-/* Iterate over governors */
-static LIST_HEAD(cpufreq_governor_list);
-#define for_each_governor(__governor)				\
-	list_for_each_entry(__governor, &cpufreq_governor_list, governor_list)
-
-/**
- * The "cpufreq driver" - the arch- or hardware-dependent low
- * level driver of CPUFreq support, and its spinlock. This lock
- * also protects the cpufreq_cpu_data array.
- */
-static struct cpufreq_driver *cpufreq_driver;
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpufreq_policy *, cpufreq_cpu_data);
-static DEFINE_RWLOCK(cpufreq_driver_lock);
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(cpufreq_governor_mutex);
-
 /* Flag to suspend/resume CPUFreq governors */
 static bool cpufreq_suspended;
 
-- 
2.2.2