linux-kernel - Re: x86/microcode update on systems without INITRD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160111211712.GI4686@pd.tnic>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jan 2016 22:17:12 +0100
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To:	Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com>
Cc:	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
	Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
	Thomas Voegtle <tv@...96.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: x86/microcode update on systems without INITRD

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 09:04:45PM +0000, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> What do modules have to do with anything?

I'm trying to address Markus' case where he spoke of having modules off
and building everything into the kernel. But CONFIG_MODULES is wrong
here, I'm not going to grep for it. As I said, I'll have to think about
it more.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--