linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] always probe UART HW when options are not specified

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56957D8B.3080906@free.fr>
Date:	Tue, 12 Jan 2016 23:26:19 +0100
From:	Mason <slash.tmp@...e.fr>
To:	Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
Cc:	Sebastian Frias <sf84@...oste.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mans Rullgard <mans@...sr.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] always probe UART HW when options are not specified

On 12/01/2016 20:47, Peter Hurley wrote:

> I expect that patch to go into -next sometime during the 4.5-rc cycle.

Do you mean the "Add Au1x00/RT288x earlycon support" patch?

I find it strange that you have rt288x_putc while also
using AU1x00_FOO. Seems like mixing naming styles.

Did you see my post about the underlying IP block?
Might be appropriate to use that name there?

Regards.