[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5675031.hi9rRCqFXs@wuerfel>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 23:51:21 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: xuejiancheng <xuejiancheng@...wei.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, mturquette@...libre.com,
sboyd@...eaurora.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de, robh+dt@...nel.org,
pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
linux@....linux.org.uk, khilman@...aro.org, olof@...om.net,
xuwei5@...ilicon.com, haojian.zhuang@...aro.org,
zhangfei.gao@...aro.org, bintian.wang@...wei.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
yanhaifeng@...ilicon.com, yanghongwei@...ilicon.com,
suwenping@...ilicon.com, ml.yang@...ilicon.com,
gaofei@...ilicon.com, zhangzhenxing@...ilicon.com,
xuejiancheng@...ilicon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/6] mfd: dt-bindings: add device tree bindings for Hi3519 sysctrl
On Tuesday 12 January 2016 17:28:05 xuejiancheng wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>> Not yet.
> >>>> Arnd Bergmann and Rob Herring all suggested adding a specific compatible string
> >>>> with the SOC name. This binding is just used for describing the compatible string now.
> >>>> When more functions on hi3519 SOC are added later, the specific driver will be also
> >>>> needed.
> >>>
> >>> Save this binding until it has more functionality. We here "I'll add
> >>> to this later" all too often.
> >>>
> >>
> >> In the hi3519.dtsi file, there is a system-controller device node described like below:
> >> sysctrl: system-controller@...10000 {
> >> compatible = "hisilicon,hi3519-sysctrl", "syscon";
> >> reg = <0x12010000 0x1000>;
> >> };
> >> Do you mean that I should remove "hisilicon,hi3519-sysctrl" and just use "syscon" as the
> >> compatible string?
> >
> > Where is this compatible string _used_?
> >
> >> If I want to add "hisilicon,hi3519-sysctrl" for hi3519. where should I put this binding?
> >> Could you give some suggestions? Thank you very much!
> >
> > If you're not using the compatible i.e. the device doesn't have its
> > own driver yet, then there is no need to supply the binding at all, is
> > there?
> >
>
> OK. Thank you.
>
Sorry for stepping in late here. I still think that every syscon device should
come with a specific compatible string, so we have the option of creating a
driver later on, and I'd like to see a binding document that lists those strings
(which I believe exists here).
It's really hard to add compatible strings later on, anything else we can
work around by keying off that string and adding a workaround in the kernel.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists