lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 12 Jan 2016 10:54:44 +0800
From:	PC Liao <pc.liao@...iatek.com>
To:	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
CC:	"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
	srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
	"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
	"Koro Chen (陳思翰)" 
	<koro.chen@...iatek.com>,
	"Hidalgo Huang (黃正和)" 
	<Hidalgo.Huang@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: mediatek: Enable 33bit memory address to support
 4GB DRAM

On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 17:02 +0800, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 09:00:50 +0100,
> PC Liao wrote:
> > 
> > @@ -603,7 +606,10 @@ static int mtk_afe_dais_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
> >  	if (ret < 0)
> >  		return ret;
> >  
> > -	memif->phys_buf_addr = substream->runtime->dma_addr;
> > +	if (sizeof(dma_addr_t) > 4)
> > +		msb_at_bit33 = (substream->runtime->dma_addr & 0x100000000) ? 1 : 0;
> 
> Better to put a proper suffix for the constant over 32bit.
> 
> Or use upper_32_bits().  Then sizeof() check can be omitted, as the
> compiler should be smart enough to know it beforehand.
> 
> 
> Takashi


Hi Takashi,

Thanks for your comment.
I change as below:
@@ -606,10 +606,8 @@ static int mtk_afe_dais_hw_params(struct
snd_pcm_substream
        if (ret < 0)
                return ret;

-       if (sizeof(dma_addr_t) > 4)
-               msb_at_bit33 = (substream->runtime->dma_addr &
0x100000000) ? 1
-
-       memif->phys_buf_addr = substream->runtime->dma_addr &
0xffffffff;
+       msb_at_bit33 = upper_32_bits(substream->runtime->dma_addr) ? 1 :
0;
+       memif->phys_buf_addr =
lower_32_bits(substream->runtime->dma_addr);


Dose this change follow your idea?
Thanks! 

PC Liao

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ