[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160112094110.GA27690@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 10:41:10 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.or,
lizefan@...wei.com, pi3orama@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] perf tools: Add -lutil in python lib list for broken
python-config
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 05:50:21PM +0800, Wangnan (F) wrote:
SNIP
> >
> > Using this option has a significant performance cost. It is best to
> >use it only when there are unavoidable circular references between two or
> >more archives.
> ></quote>
> >
> >Without --start/end-group, if we provide -l in this order:
> >
> > ... -la -lb -lc ...
> >
> >and libb.a requires a symbol in liba.a, link would fail. The simplest way
> >to avoid this is to add another -la after -lb:
> >
> > ... -la -lb -la -lc ...
> >
> >In my environment it works as if we don't provide -Wl,--start-group and
> >-Wl,--end-group.
> >I don't know why.
> >
>
> I mean the python case before I add -lutil after python libs.
> -Wl,--start-group and -Wl,--end-group
> seems not work for me. They are issued, I confirm this in strace output.
ok, got it.. I'm ok with the patch, there's no harm with extra lib,
however I think you should report this to gcc folks
also please resubmit the patch with the above comment,
to make it clear why it's there
thanks,
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists