[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160112095138.GQ6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 10:51:38 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@...tec.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-metag@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
x86@...nel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
adi-buildroot-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:43:36AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 05:14:14PM -0800, Leonid Yegoshin wrote:
> > On 01/10/2016 06:18 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > >On mips dma_rmb, dma_wmb, smp_store_mb, read_barrier_depends,
> > >smp_read_barrier_depends, smp_store_release and smp_load_acquire match
> > >the asm-generic variants exactly. Drop the local definitions and pull in
> > >asm-generic/barrier.h instead.
> > >
> > This statement doesn't fit MIPS barriers variations. Moreover, there is a
> > reason to extend that even more specific, at least for smp_store_release and
> > smp_load_acquire, look into
> >
> > http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/10506/
> >
> > - Leonid.
>
> Fine, but it matches what current code is doing. Since that
> MIPS_LIGHTWEIGHT_SYNC patch didn't go into linux-next yet, do
> you see a problem reworking it on top of this patchset?
That patch is a complete doorstop atm. It needs a lot more work before
it can go anywhere. Don't worry about it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists