[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160112101109.GC20997@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 11:11:09 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, eranian@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vince@...ter.net, dvyukov@...gle.com,
andi@...stfloor.org, jolsa@...hat.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/12] various perf fixes
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been hunting perf bugs for the past few weeks. This resulted in this pile
> of patches, that mostly seems to work -- I still get an occasional fail so
> something is still off.
>
> But I've been sitting on this for far too long, so here goes.
>
> (I've not at all tested perf-cgroup)
>
> The code compiles in between patches, but I've not bothered trying to run/test
> any intermediate stage. There's just too many inter-related fail.
>
> Alexander, Stephane, could you guys please have a hard look at this?
>
> Andi, Dmitry, patch 10 should explain the getting stuck in
> perf_install_in_context() forever thing you both have observed.
Btw., if there's no test failures I plan to apply and push this to Linus fairly
soon, so guys please give it all the review and testing you can.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists