[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160112102025.GC1084@ubuntu>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 15:50:25 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, rjw@...ysocki.net, mturquette@...libre.com,
steve.muckle@...aro.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
morten.rasmussen@....com, dietmar.eggemann@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 11/19] cpufreq: assert policy->rwsem is held in
__cpufreq_governor
On 11-01-16, 17:35, Juri Lelli wrote:
> __cpufreq_governor works on policy, so policy->rwsem has to be held.
> Add assertion for such condition.
>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index f1f9fbc..e7fc5c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -1950,6 +1950,9 @@ static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> /* Don't start any governor operations if we are entering suspend */
> if (cpufreq_suspended)
> return 0;
> +
> + lockdep_assert_held(&policy->rwsem);
> +
We had an ABBA problem with the EXIT governor callback and so this
rwsem is dropped just before that from set_policy()..
commit 955ef4833574 ("cpufreq: Drop rwsem lock around
CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT")
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists