[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160112111635.GA26496@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 12:16:36 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] perf: Sanitize perf directory structure, p1
* Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 04:14:12PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Ok, works for me. Got confused by your ascii art:
> >
> > arch/x86/events/
> > |-- amd
> > | |-- core.c
> > | |-- ibs.c
> > | |-- iommu.c
> > | |-- iommu.h
> > | `-- uncore.c
> > |-- core.c
> > `-- Makefile
> >
> > which lists events/amd/core.c.
>
> No, that's all correct. There is an amd/core.c thing:
>
> arch/x86/{kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c => events/amd/core.c} | 2 +-
>
> and there's also a arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c which would want to
> become events/intel/core.c
>
> Hmm, what do we call those then?
core.c is fine with me!
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists