linux-kernel - Re: mfd: smsc-ece1099: Fine-tuning for smsc_i2c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5694E6B2.4070604@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:	Tue, 12 Jan 2016 12:42:42 +0100
From:	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: mfd: smsc-ece1099: Fine-tuning for smsc_i2c_probe()

>> Do you request that I should resend my four update suggestions
>> for different components as a single patch series for the software
>> area "drivers/mfd"?
> 
> You have to make that decision yourself.

I chose on 2015-12-29 to send them in the combination you see.


> What I'm saying is, if the cover letter says there are 2 patches

These refer to the component "smsc-ece1099".


> in the set, that's what we should expect.

Can changes for the components "dm355evm_msp" and "twl-core"
be clarified independently?

Regards,
Markus