[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAKD3BDw8422EjzChtU23u4gKx-vegCxBuwKkLhXL1ySmACRxw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 15:08:32 +0200
From: Matan Barak <matanb@....mellanox.co.il>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
Matan Barak <matanb@...lanox.com>,
linux-rdma <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] IB/cma: allocating too much memory in make_cma_ports()
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Dan Carpenter
<dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
> The issue here is that there is a cut and paste bug. When we allocate
> cma_dev_group->default_ports_group we use "sizeof(*cma_dev_group->ports)"
> instead of "sizeof(*cma_dev_group->default_ports_group)".
>
> We're bumping up against the 80 character limit so I introduced a new
> local pointer "ports_group" to get around that.
>
> Fixes: 045959db65c6 ('IB/cma: Add configfs for rdma_cm')
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> ---
> Not tested.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/cma_configfs.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/cma_configfs.c
> index bd1d640..18b112a 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/cma_configfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/cma_configfs.c
> @@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ static int make_cma_ports(struct cma_dev_group *cma_dev_group,
> unsigned int i;
> unsigned int ports_num;
> struct cma_dev_port_group *ports;
> + struct config_group **ports_group;
> int err;
>
> ibdev = cma_get_ib_dev(cma_dev);
> @@ -168,12 +169,9 @@ static int make_cma_ports(struct cma_dev_group *cma_dev_group,
> ports_num = ibdev->phys_port_cnt;
> ports = kcalloc(ports_num, sizeof(*cma_dev_group->ports),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> + ports_group = kcalloc(ports_num + 1, sizeof(*ports_group), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> - cma_dev_group->default_ports_group = kcalloc(ports_num + 1,
> - sizeof(*cma_dev_group->ports),
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> -
> - if (!ports || !cma_dev_group->default_ports_group) {
> + if (!ports || !ports_group) {
> err = -ENOMEM;
> goto free;
> }
> @@ -187,15 +185,16 @@ static int make_cma_ports(struct cma_dev_group *cma_dev_group,
> config_group_init_type_name(&ports[i].group,
> port_str,
> &cma_port_group_type);
> - cma_dev_group->default_ports_group[i] = &ports[i].group;
> + ports_group[i] = &ports[i].group;
> }
> - cma_dev_group->default_ports_group[i] = NULL;
> + ports_group[i] = NULL;
> + cma_dev_group->default_ports_group = ports_group;
> cma_dev_group->ports = ports;
>
> return 0;
> free:
> kfree(ports);
> - kfree(cma_dev_group->default_ports_group);
> + kfree(ports_group);
> cma_dev_group->ports = NULL;
> cma_dev_group->default_ports_group = NULL;
> return err;
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi,
This is already fixed in [1].
Anyway, I'm fine with either one of them.
Acked-by: Matan Barak <matanb@...lanox.com>
Regards,
Matan
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg32152.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists