linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] arm64: dts: apq8016-sbc: move sdhci node under soc node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56950B4D.3030707@linaro.org>
Date:	Tue, 12 Jan 2016 14:18:53 +0000
From:	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
CC:	andy.gross@...aro.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] arm64: dts: apq8016-sbc: move sdhci node under soc
 node



On 12/01/16 14:00, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 January 2016 13:46:52 Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>> To be consistent with other nodes move sdhci node under the soc node,
>> rather than using lable references.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
>>
>
> Maybe remove the label as well if you are no longer using it?
Label "sdhc_1" in this case is used in aliases node.

>
My understanding so far was qcom specific dt want to use hierarchical dt 
nodes in the board files, but this brings the question of should we 
delete all the unused labels.

IMO, some unused labels are harmless and would give more consistency to 
the reader, removing them might not add great value.

Andy/Stephen, any comments?


--srini

> 	Arnd
>