linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Demote 'sign-compare' warning to W=2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <569516DE.1020002@suse.com>
Date:	Tue, 12 Jan 2016 16:08:14 +0100
From:	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel@...inux.com, maxime.coquelin@...com,
	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Demote 'sign-compare' warning to W=2

On 2016-01-12 15:24, Lee Jones wrote:
> Ideally, a kernel compile with W=1 enabled should complete cleanly;
> however, when we run one currently we are presented with ~25k warnings.
> 'sign-compare' accounts for ~22k of those ~25k.
> 
> In this patch we're demoting 'sign-compare' warnings to W=2, with a view
> to fixing the remaining 3k W=1 warnings required for a clean build.
> 
> Arnd adds:
>   "As per our discussion, I'd add that this was inadvertedly introduced
>    by Behan when he moved the clang specific warnings into an ifdef block
>    and did not notice that -Wsign-compare was interpreted by both gcc
>    and clang.
> 
>    Earlier, it was introduced in just the same way by Jan-Simon as part
>    of 3d3d6b847420 ("kbuild: LLVMLinux: Adapt warnings for compilation
>    with clang")."
> 
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Fixes: 26ea6bb1fef0 ("kbuild, LLVMLinux: Supress warnings unless W=1-3")
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>

Applied to kbuild.git#kbuild.

Michal