[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160112161024.GE30558@pd.tnic>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 17:10:24 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Pedro Alves <palves@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@...rovitsch.priv.at>,
Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@...onical.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 06/25] x86/stacktool: Compile-time stack metadata
validation
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 09:06:39AM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> This file is a straight copy from the kernel arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h
> file, and there's even a Makefile target which warns if there are any
> differences between the two. I figured it's such a minor issue that it
> wasn't worth the churn to fix both files.
That target could surely learn to ignore comments, I guess. You could
also kill that address in both files later, ontop, when you feel bored. :)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists