[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56952619.7010602@semihalf.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 17:13:13 +0100
From: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>, matt@...arand.com
Cc: bhelgaas@...gle.com, arnd@...db.de, will.deacon@....com,
catalin.marinas@....com, rjw@...ysocki.net, hanjun.guo@...aro.org,
okaya@...eaurora.org, jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com,
Stefano.Stabellini@...citrix.com,
robert.richter@...iumnetworks.com, mw@...ihalf.com,
Liviu.Dudau@....com, ddaney@...iumnetworks.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
wangyijing@...wei.com, Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com,
msalter@...hat.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org,
jchandra@...adcom.com, jcm@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 11/23] arm64, pci: Remove useless boot time IRQ
assignment when booting with DT.
On 12.01.2016 14:50, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 04:16:21PM +0100, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
>> In order to probe PCIe host controller when booting with DT,
>> ARM64 is using drivers which defer IRQ assignment to device
>> enable time. It means that boot time DT specific irq map initialization
>> is always overridden, so lets remove that code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c | 10 ----------
>> 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
>> index 023b983..f7948f5 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
>> @@ -51,16 +51,6 @@ int pcibios_enable_device(struct pci_dev *dev, int mask)
>> return pci_enable_resources(dev, mask);
>> }
>>
>> -/*
>> - * Try to assign the IRQ number from DT when adding a new device
>> - */
>> -int pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> -{
>> - dev->irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, 0, 0);
>> -
>> - return 0;
>> -}
>> -
>
> Actually, this patch should be part of Matthew's series:
>
Agree.
Matthew can you please add this patch to your series?
Thanks,
Tomasz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists