[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56953A18.2070407@citrix.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 17:38:32 +0000
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>
CC: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@...cle.com>,
"Kay Sievers" <kay@...y.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
"Mel Gorman" <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 2/2] xen_balloon: support memory auto onlining
policy
On 12/01/16 16:56, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Add support for the newly added kernel memory auto onlining policy to Xen
> ballon driver.
[...]
> --- a/drivers/xen/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/xen/Kconfig
> @@ -37,23 +37,29 @@ config XEN_BALLOON_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
>
> Memory could be hotplugged in following steps:
>
> - 1) dom0: xl mem-max <domU> <maxmem>
> + 1) domU: ensure that memory auto online policy is in effect by
> + checking /sys/devices/system/memory/auto_online_blocks file
> + (should be 'online').
Step 1 applies to dom0 and domUs.
> --- a/drivers/xen/balloon.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/balloon.c
> @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ static void release_memory_resource(struct resource *resource)
> kfree(resource);
> }
>
> -static enum bp_state reserve_additional_memory(void)
> +static enum bp_state reserve_additional_memory(bool online)
> {
> long credit;
> struct resource *resource;
> @@ -338,7 +338,18 @@ static enum bp_state reserve_additional_memory(void)
> }
> #endif
>
> - rc = add_memory_resource(nid, resource, false);
> + /*
> + * add_memory_resource() will call online_pages() which in its turn
> + * will call xen_online_page() callback causing deadlock if we don't
> + * release balloon_mutex here. It is safe because there can only be
> + * one balloon_process() running at a time and balloon_mutex is
> + * internal to Xen driver, generic memory hotplug code doesn't mess
> + * with it.
There are multiple callers of reserve_additional_memory() and these are
not all serialized via the balloon process. Replace the "It is safe..."
sentence with:
"Unlocking here is safe because the callers drop the mutex before trying
again."
> + */
> + mutex_unlock(&balloon_mutex);
> + rc = add_memory_resource(nid, resource, online);
This should always be memhp_auto_online, because...
> @@ -562,14 +573,11 @@ static void balloon_process(struct work_struct *work)
>
> credit = current_credit();
>
> - if (credit > 0) {
> - if (balloon_is_inflated())
> - state = increase_reservation(credit);
> - else
> - state = reserve_additional_memory();
> - }
> -
> - if (credit < 0)
> + if (credit > 0 && balloon_is_inflated())
> + state = increase_reservation(credit);
> + else if (credit > 0)
> + state = reserve_additional_memory(memhp_auto_online);
> + else if (credit < 0)
> state = decrease_reservation(-credit, GFP_BALLOON);
I'd have preferred this refactored as:
if (credit > 0) {
if (balloon_is_inflated())
...
else
...
} else if (credit < 0) {
...
}
>
> state = update_schedule(state);
> @@ -599,7 +607,7 @@ static int add_ballooned_pages(int nr_pages)
> enum bp_state st;
>
> if (xen_hotplug_unpopulated) {
> - st = reserve_additional_memory();
> + st = reserve_additional_memory(false);
... we want to auto-online this memory as well.
> if (st != BP_ECANCELED) {
> mutex_unlock(&balloon_mutex);
> wait_event(balloon_wq,
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists