[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160112.152025.2172413970912429668.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 15:20:25 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Cc: idosch@...lanox.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jiri@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 22:58:11 +1100
> Hi Ido,
>
> On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 11:11:02 +0200 Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com> wrote:
>>
>> The lock can be moved further down, just before mlxsw_reg_sfd_pack.
>> Other than that everything looks fine. Thank you!
>
> Thanks, I wasn't sure but I will do that tomorrow (unless Dave beats me to it).
I did the merge but did not move the locking. Feel free to send me
a patch to do so.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists