linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 5/6] rtc: max77xxx: add RTC driver for Maxim MAX77xxx series RTC IP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5695D1AF.9000806@nvidia.com>
Date:	Wed, 13 Jan 2016 09:55:19 +0530
From:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <pawel.moll@....com>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
	<ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>, <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	<linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <gnurou@...il.com>,
	<lee.jones@...aro.org>, <broonie@...nel.org>,
	<a.zummo@...ertech.it>, <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
CC:	<lgirdwood@...il.com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	<rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>, <swarren@...dia.com>,
	<treding@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 5/6] rtc: max77xxx: add RTC driver for Maxim MAX77xxx
 series RTC IP


On Wednesday 13 January 2016 09:58 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 13.01.2016 13:07, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>> On Wednesday 13 January 2016 05:36 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
>> That is also fine to me but still I am not comfortable with the config
>> name and driver file name as this does not suggest the common.
> The name does not matter. Really. We have a lot of drivers with a
> specific device-like name and supporting different devices. To point
> that your argument is invalid - your initial name of driver
> "rtc-max77620.c" supported totally different "names": the max77620 and
> max20024. It also wasn't suggesting something "common"...
In all config string, I have mentioned the MAX20024.


> With my approach we are not developing common think neither. We just
> want to extend/re-use existing max77686 (or max77802) driver for new
> devices. Just like everywhere else.

OK, fine to me if this is acceptable.
I will drop this rtc patch form this series and work in max77686 driver 
to modify first and once merged, use this config on my defconfig.