[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87vb6yc9r1.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 11:16:10 +0530
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the powerpc tree
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> writes:
> On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 19:16 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the powerpc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64
>> allnoconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c: In function 'get_paca_psize':
>> arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c:869:19: error: 'struct paca_struct' has no member named 'context'
>> return get_paca()->context.user_psize;
>> ^
>> arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c:870:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type]
>> }
>> ^
>>
>> Caused by commit
>>
>> 2fc251a8dda5 ("powerpc: Copy only required pieces of the mm_context_t to the paca")
>
> Well that's rather embarrassing, for Mikey ;D
>
>> This build has CONFIG_PPC_MM_SLICES not set ...
>
> Ugh, but it would seem none of our defconfigs do :/
4K page size with hugetlb disabled will get that
-aneesh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists