[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87h9iigce7.fsf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 08:35:28 +0100
From: Holger Schurig <holgerschurig@...il.com>
To: Lothar Waßmann <LW@...O-electronics.de>
Cc: Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: dts: imx6: add support for Ka-Ro electronics TX6S-8034 module
Lothar Waßmann <LW@...O-electronics.de> writes:
> +/ {
> + model = "Ka-Ro electronics TX6S-8034 Module";
> + compatible = "karo,imx6dl-tx6dl", "fsl,imx6dl";
> + timestamp = __DATE__, __TIME__;
Is this needed or useful?
There's a movement that aims to do "reproducible builds" ... being
able to recompile an image and verify it against the supplied can be
helpful for security audit purposes.
> + display: display@di0 {
> + compatible = "fsl,imx-parallel-display";
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_disp0_1>;
> + interface-pix-fmt = "rgb24";
> +// fsl,panel = <&lcd0_panel>;
Probably not for upstream inclusion?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists