linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: dts: imx6: add support for Ka-Ro electronics TX6S-8034 module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87h9iigce7.fsf@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 13 Jan 2016 08:35:28 +0100
From:	Holger Schurig <holgerschurig@...il.com>
To:	Lothar Waßmann <LW@...O-electronics.de>
Cc:	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: dts: imx6: add support for Ka-Ro electronics TX6S-8034 module

Lothar Waßmann <LW@...O-electronics.de> writes:

> +/ {
> +	model = "Ka-Ro electronics TX6S-8034 Module";
> +	compatible = "karo,imx6dl-tx6dl", "fsl,imx6dl";
> +	timestamp = __DATE__, __TIME__;

Is this needed or useful?

There's a movement that aims to do "reproducible builds" ...   being
able to recompile an image and verify it against the supplied can be
helpful for security audit purposes.


> +	display: display@di0 {
> +		compatible = "fsl,imx-parallel-display";
> +		pinctrl-names = "default";
> +		pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_disp0_1>;
> +		interface-pix-fmt = "rgb24";
> +//		fsl,panel = <&lcd0_panel>;

Probably not for upstream inclusion?