linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH-v2 4/4] target: Obtain se_node_acl->acl_kref during get_initiator_node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160113081518.GA12642@lst.de>
Date:	Wed, 13 Jan 2016 09:15:18 +0100
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...erainc.com>,
	target-devel <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagig@...lanox.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
	Andy Grover <agrover@...hat.com>,
	Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@...ux.intel.com>, Vu Pham <vu@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-v2 4/4] target: Obtain se_node_acl->acl_kref during
	get_initiator_node_acl

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:00:28AM -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c b/drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c
> index 52ae8ba..62f02ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c
> @@ -75,16 +75,9 @@ struct se_node_acl *core_tpg_get_initiator_node_acl(
>         unsigned char *initiatorname)
>  {
>         struct se_node_acl *acl;
> -       /*
> -        * Obtain the acl_kref now, which will be dropped upon the
> -        * release of se_sess memory within transport_free_session().
> -        */
> +
>         mutex_lock(&tpg->acl_node_mutex);
>         acl = __core_tpg_get_initiator_node_acl(tpg, initiatorname);
> -       if (acl) {
> -               if (!kref_get_unless_zero(&acl->acl_kref))
> -                       acl = NULL;
> -       }

nah, please keep the kref_get_unless_zero here, it's needed.  It's
just the misleding comment I was complaining about :)

> @@ -3435,10 +3436,14 @@ iscsit_build_sendtargets_response(struct iscsi_cmd *cmd,
>  
>                         if ((tpg->tpg_attrib.generate_node_acls == 0) &&
>                             (tpg->tpg_attrib.demo_mode_discovery == 0) &&
> -                           (!core_tpg_get_initiator_node_acl(&tpg->tpg_se_tpg,
> -                               cmd->conn->sess->sess_ops->InitiatorName))) {
> +                           (!(se_acl = core_tpg_get_initiator_node_acl(&tpg->tpg_se_tpg,
> +                               cmd->conn->sess->sess_ops->InitiatorName)))) {
>                                 continue;
>                         }
> +                       if (se_acl) {
> +                               target_put_nacl(se_acl);
> +                               se_acl = NULL;
> +                       }


Seems like with the current code we don't need to keep the ACL,
so a new helper like:

bool target_tpg_has_node_acl(struct se_portal_group *tpg,
	const char *initiatorname)
{
	struct se_node_acl *acl;

	acl = core_tpg_get_initiator_node_acl(tpg, initiatorname);
	if (acl) {
		target_put_nacl(se_acl);
		return true;
	}

	return false;
}

or fully open coded as:

bool target_tpg_has_node_acl(struct se_portal_group *tpg,
		 const char *initiatorname)
{
	struct se_node_acl *acl;
	bool found = false;

	mutex_lock(&tpg->acl_node_mutex);
	list_for_each_entry(acl, &tpg->acl_node_list, acl_list) {
		if (!strcmp(acl->initiatorname, initiatorname)) {
			found = true;
			break;
		}
	}
	mutex_unlock(&tpg->acl_node_mutex);

	return found;
}

might be better to keep the code readable.