lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:19:13 +0100
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	"Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Cc:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [RFC 6/6] perf build: Introduce FEATURES_DUMP make variable

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 05:28:28PM +0800, Wangnan (F) wrote:

SNIP

> For example:
> 
> $ make feature-dump LDFLAGS="-static"
>   BUILD:   Doing 'make -j24' parallel build
> 
> Auto-detecting system features:
> <SNIP>
> ...                          zlib: [ on  ]
> ...                          lzma: [ OFF ]     <--- looks good. I don't have
> static lzma library
> ...                     get_cpuid: [ on  ]
> ...                           bpf: [ on  ]
> 
> 
> $ make feature-dump
>   BUILD:   Doing 'make -j24' parallel build
> 
> Auto-detecting system features:
> <SNIP>
> ...                          zlib: [ on  ]
> ...                          lzma: [ on  ]   <--- also good
> ...                     get_cpuid: [ on  ]
> ...                           bpf: [ on  ]
> 
> 
> $ make feature-dump LDFLAGS="-static"
>   BUILD:   Doing 'make -j24' parallel build
> 
> Auto-detecting system features:
> <SNIP>
> ...                          zlib: [ on  ]
> ...                          lzma: [ on  ]     <--- Bad...
> ...                     get_cpuid: [ on  ]
> ...                           bpf: [ on  ]
> 
> Thank you.

right, it's because feature is not under build framework and
compilation does not care about flags change..

I'll try to check on that.. does this patch help to improve
the current speed or do you need to solve this to get substantial
speedup?

thanks,
jirka

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ