[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160113103251.GN6050@ubuntu>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 16:02:51 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, rjw@...ysocki.net, mturquette@...libre.com,
steve.muckle@...aro.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
morten.rasmussen@....com, dietmar.eggemann@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 09/19] cpufreq: fix warning for
show_scaling_available_governors unlocked access to cpufreq_governor_list
On 13-01-16, 10:25, Juri Lelli wrote:
> I couldn't really relate this comment with this patch or the backtrace.
> Can you please clarify why you are referring to switching to use
> cpufreq-dt here?
Yeah, sorry about that. One of your previous patches had backtrace
mentioning bL and so I wanted to mention that thing to you. But by
that time, I moved to the new patch and thought of just adding the
point before forgetting it completely.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists