[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160113015102.GF22188@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 17:51:02 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@...aro.org>,
Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com>,
"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/3] ARM: Use udiv/sdiv for __aeabi_{u}idiv library
functions
On 11/24, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 12:07:30PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> > My understanding is that we want to support CPU_V7VE without
> > CPU_V7 enabled so that it uses the idiv instructions in that
> > configuration. When V7VE and V7 are both enabled, we should
> > degrade to the aeabi functions, and the same is true for when
> > V7VE is disabled.
>
> Let me have another look at this, it's been a while since I touched these
> options...
>
Any ideas on how to move forward on this? I don't have a problem
removing the duplication, but I'm not sure what else can be done.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists