[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160113130909.GL6588@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 13:09:09 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, gnurou@...il.com, lee.jones@...aro.org,
a.zummo@...ertech.it, alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com,
lgirdwood@...il.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, swarren@...dia.com, treding@...dia.com,
Mallikarjun Kasoju <mkasoju@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 6/6] regulator: max77620: add regulator driver for
max77620/max20024
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 06:07:51PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 January 2016 06:01 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >What is FPS_SRC and why is it set from init_data? A driver should never
> >be looking at init_data.
> When FPS_SRC is set to NONE (this is needed from platform data) then based
> on constraint like boot enable/always enable, it need to be on desired
> state. Otherwise we may endup with disabling the rail when setting to NONE
> and create issue.
What is "it" and why can't we check what the current configuration is
while setting FPS to NONE?
> I need to set the FPS src properly for each rails before callback happen
> from regulator init so that enable/disable/is_enable can handle it properly.
Why not just reorder the callback so it happens before the constraints
are applied?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists