[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28539.1452709150@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 18:19:10 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Petko Manolov <petkan@...-labs.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mdb@...iper.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> I beg to differ. The IMA model is not broken with the current patches
> being upstreamed. The basic concepts developed will continue to be
> used, perhaps not directly by IMA.
I still object to the change to x509_key_preparse() and still want it
reverting or removing. It affects module signing too.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists