[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFwUHWb+y2gtKp55mwqocTjYv2xWzosvtO4K97VzPmfUSA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:38:10 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86,asm: Re-work smp_store_mb()
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Oh, I think this means we need a "cc" clobber.
It's probably a good idea to add one.
Historically, gcc doesn't need one on x86, and always considers flags
clobbered. We are probably missing the cc clobber in a *lot* of places
for this reason.
But even if not necessary, it's probably a good thing to add for
documentation, and in case gcc semantcs ever change.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists